![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Long accents
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Three subsequent category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Long accents |
|||||||||
b. 616
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The accent, placed in FE (→EE) over the non-played note, must have been inaccurately reproduced. According to Chopin, it could have applied to the b category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Placement of markings |
|||||||||
b. 618
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like in bar 618, one can assume that the
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Placement of markings , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||||
b. 646
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with dynamic markings of analogous bars 648-650 leads to the conclusion that the short accent over the chord in the L.H. probably reproduces Chopin's intention inaccurately. Therefore, in the main text we suggest an averaged mark in terms of both its size and assignment to one or both hands. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Placement of markings |
|||||||||
b. 648
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the placement of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Placement of markings , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |