Issues : Annotations in FED
|
b. 218
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like in bar 216, the digits present in EE and both pupils' copies denote the same fingering. In the main text, we give the indication whose authenticity is most likely, coming from FED. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||
|
b. 219
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
All sources including respective indications define the same fingering. In the main text, like in the few previous bars, we give the indications written in FED. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||
|
b. 236
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
We reproduce the four horizontal dashes written in FED, perhaps by Chopin, as wedges, since the Chopinesque wedges generally look like that in the autographs. However, it seems to be unlikely that Chopin would actually mean staccato in this place (not to mention staccatissimo). These marks are most probably to be interpreted together with the slur, as an indication of the portato articulation, close to the one the composer would usually mark with dots under a slur, e.g. in bar 231. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||
|
b. 255
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we include the characteristic Chopinesque indication, requiring the grace note to be performed simultaneously with the corresponding note in the L.H.
See the Nocturne in D category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||
|
b. 263-265
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we include the correction of the phrasing written by Chopin in FED, which we consider rather a proofreading of the erroneously interpreted slur of [A] than a change of the slurring's concept. At the same time, we interpret the fact of the slurs coinciding at the beginning of bar 264, which could also reproduce the notation of [A] inaccurately, as a continuous slur, like it was written in the first element of the progression (bars 239-240). Both in GE1 (→GE2) and GE3, the shorter slur over bar 263 seems to be an inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Inaccuracies in GE |
major, op. 27, no. 2, 
