![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Terzverschreibung error
b. 317
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE is most probably a mistake, although, just like in the case of the majority of Terzverschreibung errors, it is possible to accept the sound result. Admittedly, the bar does not repeat the previous harmonic scheme, yet the melodic analogy remains clear, and changing the final interval would distort, for no apparent reason, the octave line implemented from bar 315: category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||
b. 427
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of EE1 seems to be a Terzverschreibung error, revised by removing the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||
b. 441
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 542-543
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The visible traces of changes prove that two identical Terzverschreibung errors were committed in FE – b1 instead of d2 on the last semiquaver of the 2nd beat of each of those bars. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 543
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1, the first crotchet is a b1-b2 octave. This patent mistake could have been committed in FE, in which, however, Chopin corrected it in the last phase of proofreading. The mistake in GE1 was corrected already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |