mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Verbal indications
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Verbal indications

b. 61

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No indication in Atut

in FE (→GE,EE)
..

The emergence of the  indication must result from Chopin's proofreading in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 69

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No marking in Atut (→FE→EE)

in GE
..

The  indication in GE is either a revision by analogy with bar 61 or a mistake resulting from the similarity of these bars (concerning their position as well – both bar 61 and 69 open new lines of text).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 89

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In Atut, Chopin initially wrote a tenuto indication over the first chords; however, he eventually abandoned it. 

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A

b. 93

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The indication con forza replaced in Atut the initial .

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A

b. 103-117

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No indications in Atut

Cor., Fag., Clar. in FE (→GE,EE)
..

All indications concerning the instrumentation in bars 103-105 were added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). There is a similar situation in bars 115-117.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE