Issues : No pedal release mark

b. 398

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No sign in FE (→GE1GE2)

 in EE & GE3

[] suggested by the editors

..

The missing ​​​​​​​ mark was probably unintended by Chopin. The addition we suggest is justified by the authentic pedalling of other fragments of a similar texture, e.g. bars 155-161. An identical addition was introduced in EE and GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark

b. 399

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No sign in FE

 in GE & EE

[] suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we suggest adding a ​​​​​​​ mark before the upcoming harmonic change. A mark in the same place was added both in GE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark

b. 479-480

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No sign in FE (→GE,EE)

[] suggested by the editors

..

The missing ​​​​​​​ mark may have resulted from Chopin's inadvertence; however, it is also possible that the composer left the task of finding the right moment to release pedal to the discretion of the performer. According to us, pedal is to be held at least until the beginning of bar 479 and rather not longer than until the beginning of bar 480, which is suggested by two marks [], proposed in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: No pedal release mark

b. 515

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No marking in FE

​​​​​​​ in GE & EE

..

In FE, the absence of a ​​​​​​​ mark, ending the pedal depressed at the beginning of bar 514, must be considered an inaccuracy in this context. The mark was added in GE and EE

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark

b. 572

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No  ​​​​​​​in FE

​​​​​​​ in GE

​​​​​​​ in EE

[​​​​​​​] suggested by the editors

..

The  mark, overlooked in FE, was added in the remaining editions, although its absence does not have to be considered a mistake – cf. e.g. the Waltz in C​​​​​​​ Minor, Op. 64 No. 2, bar 15. In the main text, we suggest adding the mark in accordance with the possible phrasing, hence before the last quaver, which already begins the next musical thought.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark