|
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The earlier ending of the slur in GE could be considered a mistake – an oversight of a part of the slur falling on bars 93-94, placed on a new line of text. However, if this were the case, the slur in bar 92 should indicate a continuation, like it is in FE. Therefore, ending this slur with the last semiquaver of the bar suggests that the slurring was changed on purpose, although it is difficult to find a reason for such an action. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The indication con forza replaced in Atut the initial category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
|||||
|
b. 93-94
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
It is unclear how the oversight of a part of the slur, encompassing these bars, in GE happened – see bar 92. In the main text, we stick to the version of Atut (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add cautionary naturals before b1 and b2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
|
b. 95
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
.
before the bottom note of the octave, which was corrected in