|
b. 625-626
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the slur in GE results from an erroneous interpretation of the slightly inaccurate notation of FE – the slur in bar 625, the last one in a line of text, suggests continuation with its shape but not range. However, the slur in bar 626 leaves no doubts that it is a continuous slur. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 626-635
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accents in bars 626, 630 and 635 are most probably a result of oversights of the engraver of FE or of Chopin in [A]. In the main text, we add the missing accents like all the remaining editions. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 628
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 630-640
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In bar 630, 635, 638 and 640 in FE, there are no little slurs combining the grace notes with the quaver that ends the motif. A comparison with the remaining similar bars of this 24-bar section points to oversights of the engraver of FE or of Chopin himself. In the main text, we add the overlooked little slurs like it was performed in GE and EE. category imprint: issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 630
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
