|
b. 610
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 611
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE3, the slur combining the last two quavers in the L.H. must be inauthentic, while its absence in the remaining sources may be considered justified – the interval between those notes exceeds the hand span. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 611
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 614
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of EE must be erroneous – such 'generalisation' of schemes of figurations, particularly those containing recurrent elements, is a relatively frequent mistake of engravers – cf. e.g. bar 594. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
|
b. 615
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE1→EE2), there is no accidental before the penultimate semiquaver. The undoubtedly necessary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
in 
was added only just in