Issues : GE revisions
b. 181
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE1 (→GE2) must be erroneous – cf. analogous bar 536. The engraver must have looked, by mistake, at the line below and placed here the ending of bar 185, looking alike. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||
b. 182
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||
b. 186-190
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the sources, a cautionary was repeated before the 2nd grace note in bar 186, which, according to us, is not necessary. In bar 190 in FE (→EE), there are no naturals before any of the grace notes, which the engraver of GE considered to be an inaccuracy requiring an intervention. In the main text, we suggest naturals before the first grace note in each of these bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||
b. 187
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with the slurs of similar figures of this section (from bar 179) proves that the slur of FE (→GE1→GE2) is inaccurate, which, actually, could have had its origin in the careless notation of [A]. In the main text, we include the corresponding correction introduced in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE1 (→GE2) – certainly erroneous, cf. bars 186, 541 and 545 as well as 182 and 537 – probably came into being as a result of an overzealous action of the reviser who added here cautionary naturals before the g2 grace notes. The mistake was corrected in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |