Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 189-191
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 189
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Fontana's fingering is almost certainly identical with the indication in FED, stemming from a lesson with Chopin. In that copy, apart from the evident digit '2,' written twice in a way typical of FED, first by Chopin, then by Madame Dubois, there is a visible delicate line next to the a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |
||||||||
|
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no accidental before the penultimate semiquaver. In this situation, the absence of a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 192-193
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur must be an inaccuracy – slurs are present over all previous appearances of similar figures as well as in the analogous place in the recapitulation (bars 547-548). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
1 quaver. The mark could be interpreted as a digit '1,' yet it is uncertain, hence in the main text, we give only the '2' described above.
is a patent mistake, corrected both in 
