Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 428
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no sharps before the 6th semiquaver in the L.H. (c2) and the middle semiquavers on the 3rd beat of the bar in the R.H. (c3 and d3). All those patent inaccuracies were corrected in GE, whereas in EE it was only the mark in the L.H. that was added. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 430
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no accidentals on the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar in the L.H. In the layout adopted by the majority of the editions, i.e. the first two semiquavers of the R.H. on the bottom stave, both sharps on the 3rd beat of the bar are to be considered necessary. The accidentals were added in GE1 (→GE2); moreover, a was added before c1 at the end of the 2nd group of semiquavers. In EE, a was added before the last notes of the 2nd and 3rd groups. The layout of GE3 corresponds to the one adopted in our system; that edition contains all necessary sharps. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 435
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The ending of the slur is unclear in the majority of the editions – the slur does not go beyond d1, yet the last semiquaver, f, placed on the bottom stave, is actually under that note, so that one can assume that it is also encompassed with the slur. Such an interpretation was written in an unequivocal manner in GE3. In fact, both notations define the same performance, since d1, being a quaver, cannot be separated from the next semiquaver. In this situation, it seems to be most natural to lead the slur to the end of the passage; this is the version we adopt to the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 436-437
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The moment of division of the slurs in FE is unclear – the slurs generally overlap over A, yet the shape of the slurs suggests rather the interpretation that we deemed to be likely. However, slurs in analogous places indicate a division of the slur before the penultimate semiquaver. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 436
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no raising d1 to d1 before the 1st semiquaver in FE, which is necessary due to the previous chord having been written on the bottom stave. The mistake was corrected in EE by adding a , whereas in GE by moving the chord to the top stave (as in the main text). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |