![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 428
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no sharps before the 6th semiquaver in the L.H. (c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 430
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no accidentals on the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar in the L.H. In the layout adopted by the majority of the editions, i.e. the first two semiquavers of the R.H. on the bottom stave, both sharps on the 3rd beat of the bar are to be considered necessary. The accidentals were added in GE1 (→GE2); moreover, a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 435
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The ending of the slur is unclear in the majority of the editions – the slur does not go beyond d category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 436-437
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The moment of division of the slurs in FE is unclear – the slurs generally overlap over A, yet the shape of the slurs suggests rather the interpretation that we deemed to be likely. However, slurs in analogous places indicate a division of the slur before the penultimate semiquaver. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 436
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |