Issues : Annotations in FED
b. 530
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the tie of c4 must be a mistake (probably of the engraver of FE, although Chopin's oversight also cannot be excluded), which is proved by:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
b. 558
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 570-571
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Fontana's fingering is identical to the one indicated by Chopin in FED; it is just more accurately written out. In the main text, we include only the undoubtedly authentic entry of the composer. category imprint: issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |
|||||||||||
b. 660
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we give a fingering that was probably written by Chopin in FEH, essentially compliant with the Chopinesque entry in FED. In this situation, the authenticity of a different fingering, given by Fontana in EE, seems to be out of the question. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
b. 665-666
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering in FED quite significantly differs from the other entries in this copy in terms of size and font, so it seems that it could not have been written by Chopin or Miss O'Meara. In spite of that, the fingering is practically identical with the one that Chopin wrote above a similar sequence of chromatic fourths in the copy of the Grand Duo Concertant, Dbop. 29 belonging to Miss Forest. category imprint: Differences between sources |