|
b. 454
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Nothing proves the authenticity of the version of GE – cf. analogous bar 450. Actually, it cannot be excluded that the stem combining both notes of the octave in the R.H. was added in FE in the last phase of proofreading – it was most probably engraved independently from the stem of f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 454-455
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur after the previous, analogous figure. The absence of the slur could have been influenced by the layout of the majority of the sources, in which the first group of semiquavers in the L.H. is written on the top stave. The slur was added already in EE, but only just from the 2nd beat of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 455
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 456
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the bass clef is placed already after the 1st semiquaver. The patent mistake was corrected in both GE and EE. A respective correction was included also in FEH. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 456
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
2 in 
