Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 49-61
p. 1, b. 1-13
p. 2, b. 14-25
p. 3, b. 26-37
p. 4, b. 38-48
p. 5, b. 49-61
p. 6, b. 62-77
FES - Stirling copy
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Later impression of GE1
GET - Toruń copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French Edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
FEFr - Franchomme copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English Edition
EE3 - Later impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Later impression of GE1
GET - Toruń copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French Edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
FEFr - Franchomme copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English Edition
EE3 - Later impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FES - Stirling copy


  b. 52

Fingering written into FES

A less probable interpretation of the fingering in FED

2 interpretations of the fingering in FED

A more probable interpretation of FED

No suggested fingering

We take into account the unquestionable and natural fingering written into FES. The fingering in FED is difficult to read: it was probably written two times and it is not clear whether the same digits were written twice (121), or whether they were different digits (121 and 14). Therefore we give both options as variants. 

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Annotations in FED, Annotations in FES

notation: Fingering

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FEFr, GE1, FEJ, EE1, EE3, GE2, GET