mUltimate Chopin

Page:

Source:

p. 21, b. 420-443

p. 1, b. 1-22

p. 2, b. 23-36

p. 3, b. 37-51

p. 4, b. 52-75

p. 5, b. 76-94

p. 6, b. 95-111

p. 7, b. 112-133

p. 8, b. 134-158

p. 9, b. 159-181

p. 10, b. 182-209

p. 11, b. 210-230

p. 12, b. 231-247

p. 13, b. 248-263

p. 14, b. 264-285

p. 15, b. 286-309

p. 16, b. 310-333

p. 17, b. 334-359

p. 18, b. 360-379

p. 19, b. 380-399

p. 20, b. 400-419

p. 21, b. 420-443

p. 22, b. 444-468

Main text

FE - French edition

FE1 - First French edition

FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy

GE - German edition

GE1 - First German edition

GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1

EE - English edition

EE1 - First English edition

EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2

EE3 - Revised impression of EE2

Select notes:

mark annotations

Category

Notation

Differences

No differences

FE - French edition

FE1 - First French edition

FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy

GE - German edition

GE1 - First German edition

GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1

EE - English edition

EE1 - First English edition

EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2

EE3 - Revised impression of EE2

Importance

Undo Clear

transcript

Prezentacja

Select

copy link PDF Main text

b. 420-423

No dashes in FE (→GE,EE)

Dashes up to bar 423 suggested by the editors

Omitting dashes marking the range of a dynamic (or agogic) change is a frequent inaccuracy in first editions of Chopin's works, particularly when transitioning to a new line, as in FE (→GE,EE) here. In the main text, we suggest conducing dashes to the peak of the raising sequence, i.e.to the end of bar 423.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

notation: Verbal indications

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEJ, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, EE3

Complete ➔

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major