Issues : Errors in FE
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The missing b on the 3rd semiquaver on the 2nd beat of the bar is probably an oversight of the engraver. It is indicated by:
Due to this reason, we suggest adding that note in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The f3 note, present in FE (→GE,EE) as the 6th semiquaver of the bar, interferes with the regularity of the figuration and is most probably erroneous. It is confirmed by a most probably Chopinesque correction in FEJ. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We add pedalling, overlooked probably by the engraver of FE or Chopin in [A]. The need for marks in this place seems to be obvious due to the harmonic change in the middle of the bar. There is a similar situation in bar 63. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the sources, the octave sign does not encompass the grace note, as a result of which, when interpreted literally, it is a b1 and not a b2. The notation of analogous bar 64 proves a mistake in the placement of the octave sign. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Errors in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |