Issues : Long accents
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In all sources, 3 subsequent accents in bars 5-6 are short. We consider it to be an inaccuracy of the engraver and suggest long accents in the main text:
category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In such contexts, we encounter both short and long accents in Chopin's pieces. Therefore, it is difficult to determine without autograph which ones Chopin meant in this bar. In the main text, we preserve the notation of the principal source, i.e. FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The mark in FE paired with denotes a long accent in this context. A slight prolongation of the mark in GE made it clearly a hairpin. EE correctly considered the mark to be an accent and reproduced it as a standard, short accent. The same applies to bar 88. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 88
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE, the accent was inaccurately reproduced as a short one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |