mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : EE inaccuracies

b. 357-358

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

in bar 358 in FE (→GE)

in bar 357 in EE
..

In EE, the ​​​​​​​ mark was placed a bar too early. It is difficult to determine whether it is a mistake of the engraver or an intended revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 384-385

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

after 4. quaver in FE

under 4th quaver in GE & EE
..

In GE and EE, the earlier placement of the  markings is unintentional, resulting from an inept layout of text. There is a similar situation in bars 392-393.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies

b. 387

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

under 4th quaver in FE

after 4th quaver in GE & EE
..

The slight shifting of the  mark is an inaccuracy of GE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies

b. 400

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in FE (→EE1)
..

The lack of staccato dot in FE (→EE1) must be regarded as an inaccuracy. The mark was added already by the revisers of GE and EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 430

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur to e3 in FE

Slur from g1 to c3 in GE

Slur to c3 in EE

Slur suggested by the editors
..

In all sources, the slurs are to be deemed inaccurate. According to us, it should encompass all small quavers of the passage and the main note to which it leads. It is compliant with the convention of writing down such ornaments.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies