mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 123

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE

Short accent in GE & EE
..

Just like in bar 115, in GE and EE the accent was reproduced as a short one.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies

b. 126

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in GE
..

The missing staccato dot for the 1st note in the R.H. is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 127

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE (→GE)

Short accent in EE
..

A short accent in EE is a typical inaccuracy related to the dichotomous interpretation of long accents as accents (short) or diminuendoes.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 131

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

The engraver of GE overlooked the staccato dot for the 1st quaver in the L.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 132

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE (→EE)

Short accent in GE
..

The accent, clearly long in FE, was shortened in GE to a typical, short mark. It is a typical inaccuracy, resulting from a routine approach to the issue of accents.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions