b. 33
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
An earlier beginning of the slur in GE is most probably an inaccuracy of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The hairpin of FE (→GE,EE) starts from the middle of the bar (in GE, the engraver also overlooked the cresc. indication). We consider it to be a possible inaccuracy of the engraver or an imprecise nature of Chopin's notation and we suggest a mark beginning slightly earlier like in similar bar 31. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The missing b on the 3rd semiquaver on the 2nd beat of the bar is probably an oversight of the engraver. It is indicated by:
Due to this reason, we suggest adding that note in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The sources repeated flats before D and d on the 3rd and 4th semiquavers on the 2nd beat of the bar. We omit them in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The missing cresc. indication within the mark must be a mistake of GE. However, it was not necessarily an oversight; the notation of FE could have been considered to be unnecessarily complicated or awkward. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |