Issues : EE inaccuracies
b. 263
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
A slightly earlier beginning of the hairpin in EE could result from an inaccuracy or a routine revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 284-285
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We suggest adding a marking like it is in analog. bar 143. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 309
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The missing staccato dot in FE (→EE) is probably an oversight of the engraver, hence we add it in the main text. The reviser of GE also added a dot. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 335-336
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Before the first semiquaver of bar 336 (which starts the new line), FE (→EE) has an ending of slur from above. However, the slur in bar 335 reaches only the last semiquaver in that bar, almost certainly by mistake – cf. slurs in bars 327-328. The inconsistency of slurring was removed in GE by omitting the end of slur in bar 336, and starting a new slur from the 1st note of this bar. This is certainly an arbitrary revision. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation |