Issues : EE inaccuracies
b. 188
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The almost half-bar long hairpin in FE (→GE,EE) should be undoubtedly interpreted as a long accent – cf. a distinct accent 2 bars later. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 241-242
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE (→EE1→EE2), the beginning of a slur continued in the next bar in a new line in the R.H. is missing. The mistake was corrected in GE. In turn, in EE3, the notation is ambiguous – the reviser added a separate slur for the triplet at the end of bar 241 and left the extended beginning of the slur in bar 242. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 262
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE1 (→EE2), the engraver overlooked the staccato dot over a2. The mark was added by the reviser of EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies |