Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE (→GE,EE1), there is no accidental before the last semiquaver in the R.H. in the 1st half of the bar. The mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |
||||||||||
|
b. 88
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
|
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
FE feature an erroneous 'leggiere' instead of 'leggiero.' There is a similar situation in bar 242. It is probably because of this reason that the reviser of GE incorrectly unified those indications in the entire Rondo as 'leggiere.' EE rightly corrected the last letter. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, 3 notes making up the group on the 2nd quaver of the bar are semiquavers, as a result of which the triplet includes 3.5 semiquavers, together with the rest. The mistake was corrected both in GE and EE by shortening the last note to a demisemiquaver. The fact that it was indeed Chopin's intention is proven by a comparison with analogous bar 246. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
before g in the main text. The accidental was also added in