Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 52-60
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, all wedges in bars 52-53 and 56-60 were reproduced as staccato dots (one mark was overlooked – see bar 57). Such an arbitrary decision (inaccuracy?) frequently appears in first editions of Chopin's pieces – cf. e.g. the Sonata in B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||
|
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
A wedge instead of a staccato dot over the bass f is probably an inaccuracy of FE (→EE), since the vast majority of analogous places include a dot (cf. bars 63, 79, 231, 363, 372). Other bass notes in this section of the Rondo are also provided with dots. GE include a dot, yet it is a result of an arbitrary, routine change of all wedges to dots. There is a similar situation in bar 223. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the semiquaver beam of the bottom voice was led until c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||||
|
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
A slightly earlier beginning of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Like in the 1st half of the bar, in GE the slur was associated with the top voice only. The interpretation, however, is probably wrong – in FE, three subsequent slurs in bars 72-73 begin from the 2nd note of the respective beat, which can hardly be considered an accident. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
Minor, Op. 35, 2nd mov., 
hairpin is probably a routine revision of 
