Issues : Inaccuracies in FE

b. 36

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur suggested by the editors

..

The slur of FE (→GE,EE) must be inaccurate, which could have been provoked by a too spaciously drawn slur of [A]

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 40

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur to f2 in FE (→EE)

Slur to f3 in GE

..

In FE (→EE), leading the slur until the f2 semiquaver, from which, at the same time, a new slur begins, is probably an inaccuracy – Chopin did not encompass the entire phrase with one slur, as he did two bars later, hence it is difficult to asume that he would have wanted to obliterate a natural division of the phrase, marked by a temporary interruption of the semiquaver movement. Therefore, in the main text we include the shortening of the slur introduced in GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 44-49

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Different slurs in FE

Different slurs in GE

Different slurs in EE

Slurs from 1st note (contextual interpretation)

Slurs from 2nd note, "statistical" interpretation

..

In bars 44, 46 and 48-49, each of the semiquaver groups separated with beams (or ended with a quaver) is provided in the sources with a slur that begins either from the second or the first note, which is significantly less frequent. The differences are definitely of a random nature; we consider the slurs running from the 1st note to be corresponding to Chopin's intention, since they are more natural in terms of both musical and pianistic issues.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 48-49

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Beams in FE (→GE,EE)

Beams suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we adjust the semiquaver beam of the figure at the transition between bars 48-49 to the remaining, analogous figures. It is likely that breaking it into two beams was a simplifying solution of the engraver of FE, applied to avoid beams passing from one great stave to another. Chopin would often use beams going beyond a bar, e.g. in the L.H. part in bars 52-54 and analog.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 55

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Wedge in FE (→EE)

Staccato dot in GE

..

A wedge instead of a staccato dot over the bass f is probably an inaccuracy of FE (→EE), since the vast majority of analogous places include a dot (cf. bars 63, 79, 231, 363, 372). Other bass notes in this section of the Rondo are also provided with dots. GE include a dot, yet it is a result of an arbitrary, routine change of all wedges to dots. There is a similar situation in bar 223.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions