![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The indications added in EE2 (→EE3) are totally arbitrary in this place. The reviser could have assumed that the beginning of the actual Rondo should be provided with a specific dynamic marking, particularly since such indications appear only just in bar 90 (dolce e leggiero) and 100 ( category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
b. 52-62
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The slurs under the bass B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The reviser of EE arbitrarily added a little slur combining the grace notes with the main note, most probably by comparison with the next bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
b. 66-67
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The contrasting dynamic indications are a completely arbitrary addition of the revision of EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |