Issues : Long accents
b. 167
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE, the long accent was reproduced as a short one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 200
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The missing accent was certainly overlooked by the engraver of EE1 (→EE2). An accent – a short one – was added in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||||
b. 236
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The mark placed in FE could be interpreted as a hairpin, as in GE where it was even extended. However, in this context, it is most probably a long accent. The reviser of EE also recognized an accent in it, and reproduced it as a standard, short one. Similarly in bar 240. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions |