mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 380

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in GE
..

The lack of staccato dot over e in the L.H. is most probably an oversight of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 383

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In GE, the engraver added a staccato dot for a​​​​​​​2. It is rather a result of inaccuracy than an intentional revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 384-385

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Staccato dots in FE (→EE)

No marks in GE
..

In GE, the engraver overlooked staccato dots for the 1st quavers in the L.H. in these bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 385

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

 hairpin in FE (→GE,EE)

Long accent suggested by the editors
..

In this context, the  hairpin in FE (→GE,EE) means almost certainly a long accent – cf. an undoubted accent in a similar bar 393. Hence, it is very probable that the sign was inaccurately rendered (extended) by the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents

b. 385-386

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Hairpins in FE (→EE)

Hairpins in GE

Long accents suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE