mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Inaccuracies in FE

b. 400-401

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slurs in FE

Slurs in GE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 400

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in FE (→EE1)
..

The lack of staccato dot in FE (→EE1) must be regarded as an inaccuracy. The mark was added already by the revisers of GE and EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 420-423

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No dashes in FE (→GE,EE)

Dashes up to bar 423 suggested by the editors
..

Omitting dashes marking the range of a dynamic (or agogic) change is a frequent inaccuracy in first editions of Chopin's works, particularly when transitioning to a new line, as in FE (→GE,EE) here. In the main text, we suggest conducing dashes to the peak of the raising sequence, i.e.to the end of bar 423.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 430

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur to e3 in FE

Slur from g1 to c3 in GE

Slur to c3 in EE

Slur suggested by the editors
..

In all sources, the slurs are to be deemed inaccurate. According to us, it should encompass all small quavers of the passage and the main note to which it leads. It is compliant with the convention of writing down such ornaments.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 447

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in FE (→GE,EE1)

in EE2 (→EE3)

[] suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies