Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
|
b. 335-336
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Before the first semiquaver of bar 336 (which starts the new line), FE (→EE) has an ending of slur from above. However, the slur in bar 335 reaches only the last semiquaver in that bar, almost certainly by mistake – cf. slurs in bars 327-328. The inconsistency of slurring was removed in GE by omitting the end of slur in bar 336, and starting a new slur from the 1st note of this bar. This is certainly an arbitrary revision. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation |
|||||
|
b. 344-346
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the wavy lines next to the trill marks are short. We consider it to be an inaccuracy of notation – the need to trill throughout the entire value of the note seems to be obvious in this context – and extend the wavy lines in the main text accordingly. In GE and EE, the wavy lines are completely absent. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 344-346
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
|
b. 364
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
|
b. 370
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the slur ends on the last note of bar 370, despite its continuation on the new line. It must be a mistake of the engraver. In EE and GE, the ending of the slur was extended – a revision we deem accurate – cf. analogous bars 230-231. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
in 
2 in 