mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Slurs

b. 288

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No slur in FE (→GE,EE1)

Slur in EE2 (→EE3)
..

The slur under the first half of the bar is an arbitrary addition by the reviser of EE2 (→EE3). They possibly took into account the beginning of the analogous phrase in bar 136.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 289-290

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In FE (→EE), in bar 290 (which opens a new great stave) the slur begins from the 1st note, even though the slur that started on the last note of the previous bar should be continued. The inaccuracy was corrected only in GE.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in EE

b. 291

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No slur in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur suggested by the editors
..

As in the analogous bar 139 the lack of slur is probably an inaccuracy of notation. On this account we suggest a bracketed slur in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 293

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

b. 304-309

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Triplet-slurs in FE (→GE,EE)

No extra slurs – our suggestion
..

category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information

issues: Triplet slurs