data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
GE1
compare
Change of the rhythmic values of the grace notes introduced in GE and – most probably on the basis thereof – in EE3 must be arbitrary and unjustified, since nothing indicates that the version of FE (→EE1→EE2) could be erroneous.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, GE revisions
notation: Rhythm