![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In FE the dyad of the bottom voice (e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||||
b. 78-79
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The slurs combining the bass octaves at the transition between b. 78 and 79 are marked inaccurately in FE – in b. 78, which closes the page, there is only the slur that runs from d category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||
b. 78
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
A comparison with analogous b. 82 points to a highly likely oversight of the L.H. wedge in FE (→GE1). Therefore, we add this mark in the main text; it is also in EE. In turn, in GE1a, due to the graphic retouches performed in this fragment of the page, the R.H. wedge was overlooked, which was repeated in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 82-83
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the context of b. 78-79, the missing slurs in FE (→GE) must be an inaccuracy of the engraver of FE or of Chopin himself. In the main text we suggest adding them in the form adopted 4 bars earlier. The slurs were also added in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |