A comparison with analogous b. 82 points to a highly likely oversight of the L.H. wedge in FE (→GE1). Therefore, we add this mark in the main text; it is also in EE. In turn, in GE1a, due to the graphic retouches performed in this fragment of the page, the R.H. wedge was overlooked, which was repeated in GE2 (→GE3).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Errors in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins