mUltimate Chopin

Op. 22, Polonaise

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in GE

b. 94

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Slur from quaver in FE (→EE)

Slur from first semiquaver in GE
..

The fact that the slur in GE starts later may be a mistake of the engraver or a revision, related to the addition of the tie of b. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 121

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Staccato dot in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE
..

The missing staccato dot over a2 in GE may simply be an oversight; however, it cannot be ruled out that the mark was omitted on purpose as allegedly conflicting with the continuous slur over this note.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 132

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Minim e1 in FE (→EE)

Minim c1 in GE
..

In GE1 the minim is printed at the pitch of e1, however, the ledger line below the note is missing, as a result of which it looks like c1. Consequently, GE2 (→GE3) features here c1, which is a mistake.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 132

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No marking in GE1a (→GE2→GE3)
..

Due to graphic retouches of this fragment of the page, GE1a overlooked , which was also repeated in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE

b. 133

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Staccato dot in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE
..

The missing staccato dot in GE is probably an oversight. An intentional omission of the mark, which could have been considered a mistake in the face of the absence of respective markings in the next, analogous bars, seems to be less likely.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE