Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 47-50

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Horizontal accents in FE (→GE)

Vertical accents in EE

..

The change of accents to vertical ones is a quite frequent arbitrary action of EE. In this case, they were additionally moved over the stave, which could be considered justified by the property of piano sound – accented notes sound longer. Interestingly, in analogous b. 191-194 EE inserted authentic, horizontal accents.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 48-49

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Accent in bar 49 in FE (→GE)

Accent in bar 48 in EE

..

The engraver of EE most probably confused these bars, hence the transfer of the accent.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 51

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)

..

According to us, the accent was added here – probably by Chopin – due to the absence of the slurs, overlooked in FE (see the note below). In the main text we do not include this mark, since we add the slurs, and it is impossible to decide whether Chopin, upon seeing them, would have added an accent.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 52-53

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No marks in FE (→GE)

Staccato dots in EE

..

In the main text we add staccato dots under the B1 bass notes in these bars. There is no doubt that they should be performed with the same articulation as b. 51, hence Chopin could have considered the dot put the first time to be enough. It cannot be ruled out that the engraver of FE forgot to add a dot in a new line. Dots were added in EE. A similar situation can be found in b. 196-197.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 53-54

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Short & 3 long accents in FE

4 short accents in GE

4 vertical accents in EE

..

Three accents in b. 54 are slightly longer in FE, moved to the right and inclined, which, according to us, means that a different accent should be applied (with respect to the previous ones). Therefore, in the main text we reproduce them as long accents. The described difference was not considered significant in GE, whereas EE changed these accents to vertical ones. However, since it was also the last accent in b. 53 that was reproduced as vertical in EE, this change most probably was not related to the graphic representation of the accents in FE – arbitrary changes of accents to vertical ones are generally typical of EE – cf. b. 47-50.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE