Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 93

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No slur in FE (→GE1)

Slur from 2nd semiquaver in EE

Slur from first semiquaver in GE2 (→GE3)

Slur from quaver suggested by the editors

..

The absence of the slur in FE (→GE1) – irrespective of the reason – must be considered a mistake. In the main text we give the same slur as the one featured in FE in the next bar. The slur was also added in EE and GE2 (→GE3); however, none of them took into account the authentic slur from analogous b. 94.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 94

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Slur from quaver in FE (→EE)

Slur from first semiquaver in GE

..

The fact that the slur in GE starts later may be a mistake of the engraver or a revision, related to the addition of the tie of b

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 95

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Slur to d2 in GE2 (→GE3)

..

The ending of the L.H. slur must be inaccurate in FE (→EE,GE1), even if FE faithfully reproduced the notation of [A]. In such a parallel passage, the fact that the hands are provided with different slurs is inconceivable; a comparison with the two previous bars proves that it is the R.H. slur that is correct. The longer slur was introduced in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 101

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Slur from in FE

Slur from in GE & EE

..

The slur of FE must be inaccurate, since there is no substantive reason for it not to encompass the entire passage. In turn, it is easy to misinterpret the beginning of the slur in this layout, if – which is highly likely – the beginning of the slur in [A] did not go beyond the top stave (cf., e.g. the autograph of the Etude in F Major, Op. 10 No. 8, b. 16, 29, 65 or the Concerto in F Minor, Op. 21, I mov., b. 235). Due to this reason, in the main text we include the extended slur of GE and EE. A similar inaccuracy, although less significant, can be suspected at the end of this slur.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 102-103

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Slur to end of bar in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur to G suggested by the editors

..

In the main text we lead the slur to the end of the passage due to the reasons discussed in the preceding bar.

category imprint: Editorial revisions