EE2
compare
2-d3 in 
A comparison with analogous b. 69, and particularly with b. 175, which was almost certainly marked in [A] as a repetition of b. 31, proves the mistake of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE1). The mistake was corrected in EE2.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE
notation: Pitch
