Issues : Errors in EE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 106
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
Both the missing accent in EE1 and its placement on the 3rd semiquaver of the bar in GE1 (→GE2) must be mistakes. The oversight of the accent in EE1 could have been repeated after FE, in which the mark was then added in the last phase of proofreading. The addition of the accent in EE2 in an erroneous place may mean that the reviser did not compare this bar with b. 62, but with GE1 (there is also a possibility that it is simply a mistake, e.g. of the engraver). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The version of EE is almost certainly a mistake: oversight of the quaver flag. In GE1a flags were overlooked next to the last two notes of the bar, which is a side effect of the graphical retouches in this fragment of the page. The mistake was not repeated in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »