EE1
compare
b. 232
The version of GE must be erroneous – cf. analogous bar 120. The mistake was probably also in FE, where, however, it was corrected – perhaps by Chopin – in the last phase of proofreading.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Authentic corrections of FE, Errors repeated in GE
notation: Pitch