b. 248-249
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In the main text, we give the fingering written in pencil to FES (with one added digit for more clarity), coming most probably from Chopin. A different fingering, probably coming from Chopin, is in FESf. The poorly legible annotation in FEO may be interpreted in a variety of ways – we suggest these interpretations that lead to a pianistically natural fingering as variants. The fingering in EE comes from the editor and it is inauthentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEO , Annotations in FESf |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 250
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 250
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In EE2 (→EE3), the reviser arbitrarily added staccato dots for the R.H. in the 2nd half of bar 250 – probably by comparison with similar melodic and rhythmic figures in the adjacent bar. Assuming the legitimacy of this addition, it is impossible, however, to understand why he did not introduce a similar solution in analogous bar 136 or why the marks are only in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 251
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
We suggest adding staccato dots, the same as in analogous bar 137. The dots are present in GE (perhaps added by Chopin in a proofreading) and in EE (added by the reviser, most probably by comparison with bar 137). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 253
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
The staccato dot in GE must be considered an accidental mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |