Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 126-127

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

1 slur in A & GE2

2 slurs in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

Breaking the slur between these bars is a characteristic inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1 (after all, the two-bar slur in bars 125-126 is already a result of proofreading – the remaining elements of original slurs show that each of these bars was most probably embraced with a separate slur). The continuous, four-bar slur written in A was restored in GE2. See also bars 128-129.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Corrected slurs of Op. 21 in GE1

b. 128-129

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Slur up to bar 129 in A & GE2

Slur to end of bar 128 in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

Ending the slur before the last note of this passage in unison is certainly an inaccuracy. Both changes to which the slur of A was subject in GE1 are deformations typical of the engraver of this edition – dividing a long slur and adjusting it to metric structures.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 145-160

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

No L.H. slurs in A (→GE1FE)

L.H. slurs in EE

L.H. slurs in GE2

..

In the entire section, Chopin wrote only one slur in the part of the L.H. in A, in bar 146. The fact that he then resigned from repeating the slurs written in the R.H. is proved by the notation of bar 160, opening a new page in A: in the part of the L.H. one can see there a deletion of a slur reaching the a minim and suggesting continuation from the previous bar. Therefore, the decision to add slurs, which were introduced in the entire section in EE (apart from bar 157) and GE2, was arbitrary, and it almost certainly does not correspond to Chopin's intention. Moreover, the added slurs differ between EE and GE2, since each of them copied the slurs of the R.H., which in EE generally correspond to the slurs of GE1, whereas in GE2 – to the slurs of A (cf. bars 152156157-158 and 159).
In the main text we preserve the notation of A. We discuss more complex situations from the point of view of sources in bars 146-148148 and 154 and 151 separately. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 146-148

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

2 slurs in A & GE2

Slur from b1 in GE1

Slur from e1 in FE (→EE)

..

Combining the slur beginning in bar 146 with the next one is a patent mistake of GE1 (→FEEE). It is one of many examples of flagrant ignorance of the notation of A, since the slurs in the manuscript are unambiguous. The correct slurs were restored in GE2. In FE (→EE), the mistake of GE1 was complemented with an inaccurate beginning of the slur in bar 146, which, next to the oversight of a staccato sign in this bar, completely distorted the vision of phrasing of the beginning of this bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 146-148

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Slur in bar 146 in A

Slur over triplet in bar 146 in GE1

No slur in FE

Slur in bars 146-147 in EE

Slurs in bars 146-148 in GE2

..

In the main text we include only the slur written by Chopin in A – see bars 145-160. The versions of GE1 and FE are most probably erroneous, whereas the ones of EE and GE2 – arbitrary.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions