Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 494-501
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Out of eight long accents written in A, GE1 reproduced in this form only the mark in bar 497, which is naturally an accidental inaccuracy. The mark in this bar is slightly longer also in FE (→EE); however, the difference is so small that it is difficult to consider it meaningful. In GE2 all accents were unified. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 502
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→EE1→EE2) the bottom note of the chord is an erroneous e (corrected only in EE3). In A (→GE) the text is correct. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 508-509
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, there are no slurs over six quavers, from c3 to a3. The patent mistake was corrected in EE. Similar mistakes in articulation markings were committed also in the L.H., in bars 507-508. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 508
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, the staccato dot over a2 was placed by mistake only over the 5th quaver. Other mistakes of FE in the final passage – see bars 506-510 and 508-509. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 514
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The version of FE (→EE) must be a mistake, perhaps a side effect of removing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
. The version of