|
b. 468
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
We suggest adding an arpeggio mark in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 468
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 469-474
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
No dashes after cresc. must be an inaccuracy of GE1 (→FE→EE). Their omission in GE2 in bars 473-474 is most probably a mistake, too – the bars open a new line of text in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 469-472
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Although Chopin returned to double slurs in the bass (cf. bars 430-433) in the next bars, in the main text we preserve single slurs in this place, since the difference seems to be intentional, however, it is not easy to indicate what performance detail could be related to this difference in notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 469-470
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The slur over bar 470 is combined with the previous slur in A. GE1 reproduced it inaccurately – the ending of the slur in bar 469 suggests continuation, yet in bar 470, opening a new line, the slur runs only from the 1st quaver. Both FE (→EE) and GE2 interpreted it as separate slurs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
