b. 55-56
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Replacing the tie of c3 with an e2-f2 phrase mark is a result of a misunderstanding of A by the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). The correct text was restored in GE2. Cf. bars 53-55. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The sign in A is undoubtedly a long accent on the 2nd beat of the bar, although due to the crossing-out in the part of the R.H., its relation to the corrected chord partly disappeared. It was most probably the reason for the erroneous reproduction of the sign in GE1 (→FE→EE) as a whole-bar hairpin. GE2 deciphered the sign's function correctly, but not the kind of the used accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The chord in the R.H. on the 2nd beat of the bar was crossed out in A and rewritten to the left of the original position. It is possible to read the initial notation – it was a chord written in two parts with a c2-f2-a2 crotchet in the bottom voice and an e3 minim in the top one. One can see that Chopin wrote one line too many and in the proofread version he also resigned from the f2 note. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Terzverschreibung error , Errors in the number of ledger lines , Errors of A , Deletions in A |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 57-59
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, over the pair of chords in bars 57-58 we give the articulation markings from A – a slur and a staccato dot. Just like in bars 54-55, we also suggest adding them in analogous bars 58-59 (and also in the L.H. – see bars 49-59). In GE1 (→FE), the staccato dot was placed – most probably erroneously – over the first and not the second chord of the pair in bars 57-58, whereas in EE it was overlooked. Moreover, the slur over the pair of chords was repeated in GE1 also in bars 58-59, which is, however, probably a result of an erroneous interpretation of the tie of c2. In FE (→EE), both slurs – in bars 57-58 and 58-59 – were moved under the chords, combining the g1-a1 sounds. GE2 arbitrarily repeated in these bars the markings from bars 53-55. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 57-59
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The ties of c2 were overlooked in GE1 (→FE→EE). One can assume that, just like in analogous bars 397-399 and 401-403, the engraver of GE1 did not understand the correct meaning of these ties and identified them with phrase marks he put next to the top notes of the pairs of chords. In GE2, the ties were reproduced correctly. See also bars 53-55. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |