|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The division of the slur in A is probably the original version, left due to deletions and inability to write a continuous slur in a graceful way. However, such slur is in the L.H. and in GE (→FE→EE), where Chopin's possible intention was interpreted correctly. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A, Chopin wrote the text of bar 35 in the part of the R.H. by accident. Having noticed his mistake, he deleted it and wrote the correct text on an adjacent stave. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 35-41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we suggest adding the slur in the L.H. – slurs in the L.H. are present both before and after this phrase, hence a missing slur could suggest a difference in performance between the right and left hand, which certainly was not Chopin's intention. When the phrase returns in bars 379-385, the slur in the L.H. is also absent, but in this case, Chopin consistently gave slurs only in the R.H. in the entire fragment in unison (bars 377-388). A similar addition was introduced already in EE as well as in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE all 5 notes in the part of the R.H. are combined with a quaver beam. The patent mistake was corrected in EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Rhythmic errors |
|||||||||||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we omit the poorly justified cautionary flats before d category imprint: Editorial revisions |
1 and d