|
b. 446-448
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we reproduce the elaborate notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 448
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 449
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 449
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The apparent wedge of A was inaccurately reproduced in GE1 as a dot. Moreover, it was placed so close to the octave sign that it was then overlooked both in FE (→EE) and GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 449-451
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The ending of the slur beginning in bar 449 is inaccurate in A, which is confirmed by, among others, the comparison with the next, identical figure (see also bars 409-419). GE1 (→FE→EE) convey the literal interpretation of this slur, yet the contextual interpretation, adopted by us to the main text, was included in GE2. The division of the next slur in bar 450 is an arbitrary action of GE1 (→FE) – in spite of the transition to a new page, the notation of A is unambiguous. In EE, the extension of the first of the two slurs, created as a result of this division, mitigated the consequences of the mistake of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
is most probably an oversight of the engraver of 
