Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we give the slurring of A, since nothing indicates a later Chopin intervention in any of the editions. In GE1 the first two slurs of A were reproduced inaccurately to such an extent that their range was actually changed. This is how, already without ambiguities, they were printed in FE (→EE). The extension of the third slur is most probably a mistake of the engraver of FE (→EE) while the version of GE2, in which the middle slur was overlooked, is certainly arbitrary. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The accent in A is clearly bigger than the adjacent ones, hence we give it in the main text as long. The short accent in the editions is most probably a typical inaccuracy of GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, an earlier placement of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Sign reversal , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Extending the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The version of the majority of the editions is most probably a result of having misunderstood the notation of A: the erasure of the grace note may be considered the beginning of a slur over the group of semiquavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
in 
in 
