Rhythm
|
b. 76-80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Chopin did not write digits specifying the number and structure of the groups of six semiquavers in bars 76 and 80. We suggest a [6] to facilitate the reading. Additions were made also in GE2 – a '6' in bar 76 and two '3's in bar 80 (as well as a '3' at the beginning of bar 80). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
|||||
|
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Longer rhythmical values of the roulade in GE are certainly erroneous, although Chopin did sometimes use this kind of notation (cf. bar 41). The error was corrected in FE, possibly by Chopin. The demisemiquavers in EE also are supposedly a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The eight-note figure filling the 3rd quaver of the bar was written in A by Chopin as a demisemiquaver septuplet. The patent mistake was partially corrected in GE2, by writing it as an octuplet of demisemiquavers. According to us, there are no reasons for such an atypical notation, hence we replace the septuplet with a regular group of hemidemisemiquavers. In FE (→EE) the second note was overlooked, which removed the incompatibility of the notation with the actual state. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
|||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
It was probably the lack of the triplet marking over the first group of semiquavers that induced the reviser of EE to arbitrarily change the rhythm. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
